Coogler v. Berry., 117 Ga. App. 614, 161 S.E.2d 428 (1968)

Georgia Court Of Appeals

Linked as:

Summary


Dismissed. Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Summary


Dismissed. Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Text


Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Edward J. Henning, for appellant.

Where, pending an action the defendant died and the executor of his last will and testament was substituted as party defendant, as provided by Code Ann. 81A-125, the person named as executor is not individually a party to the action and he may not appeal from a judgment entered adversely to the executor. "[O]nly a party to the case can appeal from a judgment" (McCoy v. Sasnett, 106 Ga. App. 211 (126 SE2d 716); Compton v. Weekes, 107 Ga. App. 283 (129 SE2d 824); Alexander v. Fontenot, 113 Ga. App. 36 (147 SE2d 25); Eubank v. Barber-Colman Co., 115 Ga. App. 217 (1) (154 SE2d 638). The notice of appeal cannot be amended to substitute a new party. Bivens v. Todd, 222 Ga. 84 (2) (148 SE2d 424).

Consequently, where the only notice of appeal in these cases was entered in his individual capacity by the person named as executor of the will of the deceased defendant, no valid appeal pends before us and the appeals must he

Hutcheson & Kilpatrick, Lee Hutcheson, Davis & Stringer, Thomas O. Davis, for appellees.

1968

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company