Summary
Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.
Summary
Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.
Text
A. Wallace Cato, District Attorney, for appellee.Drew, Hendrix & Shea, John W. Hendrix, for appellant.
The defendant was convicted of performing an illegal abortion. A motion for new trial was overruled and the case is here for review. Held:
2. Enumeration of error number 3 argues that certain testimony should not have been admitted. However, no proper objection was made. Aycock v. State,
4. In enumeration of error number 5 it is argued that a State's witness should not have been allowed to testify as to a phone conversation she had with the defendant. However, this evidence was not objected to at the time it was offered. See Clydesdale Bank v. Blackshear Mfg. Co., 221 Ga. 636 (1) (146 SE2d 895). The evidence showed that the other abortions were so similar in point of time and method that proof of one tended to prove the present case. Craig v. State,
106 (4) (222 Ga. 321 (1) (149 SE2d 674). Enumeration of error number 17 is without merit.
9. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
1971
Sponsored links