Wright v. The State., 175 Ga. App. 788, 334 S.E.2d 382 (1985)
Linked as:
Summary
Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.
Summary
Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.
Text
Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Richard E. Hicks, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.Kenneth D. Feldman, for appellant.
Rosetta Wright appeals her conviction of aggravated assault by use of a knife and a broken bottle as deadly weapons.
The sole enumeration of error is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Held:
Although the evidence was conflicting, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we are satisfied that it was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Brennon v. State,
Sponsored links
